Monday, April 5, 2010
Weight lost: 27 pounds (2.25 pounds/week)
First time bodyfat shows under 30% (although this number on the Tanita is not accurate for small changes, the overall move from 37% at the beginning is good.
Good work! Also felt good to be back home and have control over what I eat more easily.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Too tired to do much more than post the updated weight and I'll be gone the next Monday to Canada, not back until April 3, so suspense until then! While I'm gone, it'll be much tougher to "stay on target" (as one of my frequently quoted lines from Star Wars--usually when the GPS is saying, "Stay on I35").
Loss so far: 23 pounds in 10 weeks (2.3 pounds/week), but clearly slowing down, as expected.
Monday, March 15, 2010
The first week I haven't lost--and gained slightly, but I can understand. Sunday we had lunch at a new Mexican restaurant: (ribeye) carne asada, but also two chips, half a margarita, and some of the beans and rice (oh yeah, and about half an avocado). Not too bad. But Sunday evening was dinner at friends: controlled on appetizers, but a fair number of almonds and some cheese (no crackers), plus a glass and a half of white wine. Dinner (which didn't come until around 8 PM--daylight savings began) was salad (nice!), one very small piece of bread, chicken (lovely!), mixed veggies, and some rice/wild rice/mushroom pilaf. I didn't eat all the pilaf, but did eat about half. Also another glass and a half of red wine. Then dessert was berries and a champagne/chambord cocktail with some raspberries in it.
Again, a really lovely meal, but more carbs than I've been eating (lots more, actually), more total food than I've been eating, and FAR more alcohol than I've been drinking! I felt a bit bloated and slow and a bit hung over/dry mouth that night and this morning. I have to behave better this week, if only to feel better!
At that, gained 1/2 pound this week and I'd imagine some of that was retained water from the two meals on Sunday. If I remember, I'll check tomorrow morning for a more realistic look at weight. Or . . . the slowdown may have begun!
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
It's a reminder that metabolically, I still have lots of the visceral fat that wreaks havoc on your body. For me, there's still a long way to go.
That's why it's important that I think of this as transformation -- in other words, a permanent change in the way I am, how I behave, how I think of myself.
This first 8 weeks of change is without much exercise--that simply hasn't been my focus yet . . . but it will be! I know it's a question of when and how, not if. And the next change for me might well be meditation and a change to my bedtime habits. I'm still doing lots of reading, still haven't fully decided what will be the next transformation to begin.
But I'm excited to still be on the path after 8 weeks -- and excited to see what will come.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Weight 222, bodyfat 33.5, so a 2 pound loss for a total of 21.5 pounds lost. As I mentioned, when I go under 220, that will be the first time in a long time. Photos will come this week.
Monday, March 1, 2010
I think the thing I'm proudest of this week is keeping on target with the program despite travel. I was doing a gig in Southern California this weekend, so flew to Burbank on Friday, worked on Saturday, then flew back on Sunday. Very different than past travel in terms of eating, I'd say:
I brought some nuts along, so on the flight out skipped any soft drinks and only drank water and ate some of the nuts. That evening, dinner was on my own, so ordered roast chicken from the hotel restaurant, no potatoes--quite good, I'd say! I'd also brought two of the dove dark chocolates, so had one as well. Saturday morning was a couple eggs scrambled, bacon, and fruit (some cantaloupe, strawberries, raspberries, and pineapple)--more fruit than I'd eat at home, but good. Lunch was at the university, a typical make-your-own sandwich buffet table, so I did a kind of mixed salad plate, taking no bread: turkey, cheddar cheese, lettuce, tomatoes, and a pickle. No cookie, although they looked tasty! For dinner that evening with one of my colleagues (as groups were warming up) a steak and salad--my other dark chocolate after the evening's judging. I skipped the brownies and the proffered soft drink at the reception. The same breakfast the next morning, but they gave me more eggs, I'd guess about three eggs scrambled. Same on plane going back--just some nuts and water. When I got home I had a protein shake and my chocolate before going to bed.
This is a huge change from prior travel, which would mean having one or two cokes on the flight, plus whatever they gave me in terms of carb-y snacks, plus perhaps a candy bar, chips or something while waiting at the airport. I certainly would have had more soft drinks at lunch and a couple cookies (and perhaps taken another couple to have later).
So I'm happy with where I am at this point of transforming the way I eat.
Weight lost this week: 1 1/2 pounds
Total: 19 1/2 pounds
Monday, February 22, 2010
Crazy schedule has meant crazy sleep/waking patterns, not the best for me, so walking has been less frequent and core exercises as well. My back was also feeling really unstable and I think I may have tweaked it with one of the exercises, so I'm taking it a little easy, but will also ease back in.
I've been doing lots of reading about concentration, focus, time management, etc., etc. Some great stuff and I'll share some when I have time.
But this "transformation" is not meant to be just physical: I want to be more in control of my life and how I live it, to be able to accomplish what I want, to learn to be fully present whether at work or at play (and blur the lines between them, so that all seems to be play). Again, the process is important for me and is the focus, rather than the result, because I want the changes I make to be a true transformation . . . and a permanent one.
This week's results:
Monday, February 15, 2010
Bus stop near fast food places for dinner on Thursday: Wendy's chili and a fish sandwich (eating only the fish), but with beans in the chili and breading on the fish, still more carbs than I've been getting. A bit of chocolate chip cookie upon arrival at the hotel (but that was all!). Friday morning breakfast: eggs, bacon and fruit (more fruit than I've been doing, too). Friday day, shared Margarita (scratch margarita, but probably still containing a simple syrup, I'm sure) and taco salad. Some nuts for a snack later in the afternoon, then nothing until after a concert: a full margarita, then at a reception late Friday (9:30-10:30, much later than I've been eating) more fruit (quite a bit more), a fair amount of cheese, and meatballs with a somewhat sweet bbq sauce . . . then more cheese. Saturday's trip back home had a similar breakfast and the same fast food stop on the way home, but this time a deli with a nice chef's salad (with a small amount of honey mustard dressing).
Both Saturday and Sunday early when I woke up I had the sore, arthritic kind of pain, inflexibility in my hands--which I haven't had for several weeks.
In the end (or when closer to goal--whatever that is!) it will be interesting to experiment adding back food types one at a time (bread/other wheat, beans, corn, potatoes, etc.) and seeing what the result is (reactions like the arthritic ones, raised blood sugar, etc.). But that's an experiment which is some ways off!
Monday, February 8, 2010
My wife's been making lovely dinners. Tonight: chili (beef, no beans), guacamole, carrot sticks, celery sticks, and half an apple. Last night, smoked pork chops, green beans, cole slaw (not creamy, but made with a fabulous California olive oil flavored with blood orange), and some avacado chunks a few slices of orange.
Most breakfasts have been protein drinks (as before, water, one scoop Designer Whey, one scoop Metabolic Drive, some coconut oil, a scoop of natural full-fat yogurt, and a little cream).
Walking has been slightly more often (probably four days this week) and the associated back/core exercises.
Sleep's been variable, last night not good at all. Went to bed, mind ran around in circles, and got up again. Asleep at 3 or so, up at 6:45.
I've been reading a lot about willpower, concentration, focus, meditation, etc., figuring out my next step in transformation (I'll say more about the reading later). It will probably be beginning a meditation practice, at least one of those times before bed. As I stated earlier, I need a bedtime routine, with meditation (and some space) after any TV, reading, or computer work (like this, at 11:24 PM!). A way to transition. I'll probably begin next week. Again, no hurry. I want these changes to be permanent, not (as before) a short-term effort.
Weight this week:
Thursday, February 4, 2010
This Week (after 3 weeks):
. . . and bodyfat
How have I done?
Down another 3.5 pounds, total 11 pounds in 3 weeks, better than I would have expected. Body fat percentage is much harder to gauge, since electric impedance measuring of body fat can vary widely, depending on how much water you're retaining. It's particularly hard to gauge versus my opening body fat, which measured 33%, then to 37% for the next two weeks, and now 36%. Assuming I stay on target with lower carbs, then I should be more consistent, so probably the 37% is fine for a beginning measuring point. But small losses won't mean much, week to week. It'll be the longer-term changes, trending in the right direction, which will be significant.
From a compliance standpoint, it's been great and I've been able to do so without any real feelings of hardship, even when going to a Mexican restaurant and avoiding the chips and salsa (earlier I would have scarfed down the equivalent of a basket before even starting the meal--and probably had a coke to drink as well). At home, I've kept to good foods, moderate snacking on nuts, and my one indulgence every night of one dove dark chocolate.
I've also had several days with no lunch--just the schedule, not a deliberate attempt--which is the beginnings of doing some intermittent fasting. I'll do more of that, no doubt, aiming for a couple days a week with a longer fast (perhaps dinner to dinner: no breakfast or lunch).
My walking has been at least a few days a week, 3 to 4 times. Back exercises the same. I will work to make more consistent.
I went to Bikram Yoga last week. The session was as remembered . . . very intense, but good. I was sore the next couple days, particularly my back and shoulders. I would love to do this . . . but the Bikram place is quite a distance and when I went (for the 8:30 AM class) the traffic was nasty. Left an hour before, got there about 10 minutes before class was to begin. Unpleasant, to say the least! That means leaving at 7:30, class until 10 AM, ca. 35 minutes home, shower/ablute/dress, eat, and get to school ca. 11:30. I simply can't afford that. And with an 8 AM class two days a week, it doesn't combine very well.
They have a 5:30 AM class, which probably means leaving by 4:45 and getting up by 4:15 or so. Even then, I can't do this and be back for my 8 AM classes, so I'd have to do it on other days. The biggest problem, though, is that I'm a musician and have many evenings at concerts. To get up at 4:15 every morning, but have evenings when I don't get home until 10 PM (and am usually fairly wired) would likely mean not enough sleep.
A dilemma. I might try the early class to see how it feels, but it's a challenge to make it work, get to bed early enough consistently enough to make it worthwhile. We'll see.
By the way, this week the cluster headaches finally gave up and went away! I'm so happy to be headache-free and not taking tylenol in addition to naproxen!
Will try to write more often.
Monday, January 25, 2010
About 1 1/2 pounds in week two, fairly typical.
I continue to eat well. Exercise is not as often as I would like, but better.
Cluster headaches continue, with one of the worse ones yet today.
Sleep still inconsistent, will try next week to do better.
Just keep at it!
Friday, January 22, 2010
I've been walking most mornings (although not this one) and continued back exercises. Cluster headaches continue, a bit worse, but manageable (although it means taking naproxen + tylenol--not especially liver-healthy). If my past history is a guide, the series lasts for two to three weeks, then fades. My sleep is marginally better, but headaches often awaken me early in the morning. Hopefully, that will change. With the return to teaching I've been getting up much earlier, but haven't yet gotten to a consistent, every day wake time (I will).
I mentioned back problems: minor injury in gymnastics in HS (landed a dismount and back went into spasm), continuing occasional problems, gradually getting worse, leading to an L4/5 (the lower discs) laminectomy (disc surgery--they go into the spinal canal to remove disc material that has extruded into the canal and is pressing on nerve roots) in 1986 (and was repeated in 1989). In my case, I was having numbness of the toes of my left foot, extreme sciatic pain, etc. Lots of conservative treatments were tried with no success. In 1988-89 I knew things were still not right and had several episodes of spasm, went on a trip to Sweden and Germany in April (it was to be for 3 months), but cut short the trip after 2 months and flew home, had an MRI, and the second surgery.
I've been OK since, although I still have to be careful and can have persistent low-back pain or short periods in spasm.
As I've recently discovered, the exercises most closely connected with better backs are about stability. By that I mean not: flexibility (helpful, but may make the problem worse), strength (isn't the full issue), or other elements. If the correct muscles can gain considerably in endurance (not so much strength), the spine is kept much more stable and the back muscles will not go into spasm.
Much of the research is by Stuart McGill in Toronto. He has several books on the subject and I've just ordered a new book by Rick Jemmett: Back Stabilization: The New Science of Back Pain. The most common exercises are:
1 - the bird dog, which strengthens the multifidus muscles, which weave through the spinal facets and stabilize the spine
2 - the plank, which strengthens and stabilizes the abdominal core
3 - the side plank, which strengthens the transverse abdominals (this video shows both regular and side plank variations). This link also has a very good interview with Stuart McGill, plus one of McGill's other exercises, the curl-up.
Again, the first goal is endurance, so exercises are gradually extended in length of time/number of repetitions. With the side plank, I'm only strong enough to do this from the knees, so I need to wait until I get sufficient strength and endurance before I start to do from the feet (see the video to see what I mean). As you can see in the last video, one can combine side plank to regular plank to side plank (on the other side) without pause--much more advanced, of course.
My past experience is that if I DO these exercises regularly, my back feels MUCH better. The point is to do them--and that's the point of this transformation . . .
Monday, January 18, 2010
The week was fine in terms of eating. I kept quite strict, only having a salad with chicken tenders (i.e. breaded) when at an Italian restaurant Sunday with friends. It was the least objectionable option (that I liked). I'm too picky about which vegetables I like and have too small a repertoire. I'll work on that at some point, but not now.
Exercise stayed on track, but minimal. Today I walked with my wife for about 30 minutes, followed by my back exercises. Again, I'm trying to limit the number of changes I'm making to only one or two at a time. The temptation to do too much at once (and fail) is strong! But I know from past experience that I need to introduce changes slowly.
I've had cluster headaches for some years now--and the term "suicide headaches" is an apt one! When they're really bad, they're truly unbearable. The worst episode had my blood pressure (when I went in to urgent care) over 200, really frightening. I haven't had any episodes as bad as that for a couple years, and my doctor recommended a blood pressure medication (amlodipine) and naproxen on an ongoing basis. Usually acetaminophen in addition is needed when I have attacks.
This week has been a time of mild attacks. It's hard to know if the diet has anything to do with it. I'm also under a bit of stress right now, so that could be a part of it, too.
All in all, not too bad for a first week. It's the long road that counts.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Tuesday I was dead--no energy at all, occasional dizziness Tuesday and Wednesday when I changed position quickly. Those are both fairly typical for me, particularly if I cut carbs after a period of high carbs, and my carbs had indeed been high over the Christmas break! Since Tuesday, my energy has been much better and I expect it will continue. Again, I'm not shooting for ketosis: I'm still eating my lovely little clementine oranges or an apple at each meal, some nuts, green beans, salad, etc. This is more "Primal" than Atkins "Induction," and that's fine with me. I expect I'll experiment with Intermittent Fasting once I've adapted.
Sleep hasn't yet been a focus for me--good sleep some of the time, terrible on Tuesday night (just a few hours) and then last night to bed around 1:30 AM, up for a couple hours early, then back to sleep until 12:30 PM. That won't continue, if only because classes at the university where I teach begin next Tuesday and I have 8 AM classes two days a week and probably a meeting at 8 at least one other day, so it means I have to be up by 6:15 AM or so every morning. That's the time for me to work on a consistent waking time. The challenge will be getting to bed at a reasonable time (and building a night-time routine).
Exercise has also been sporadic, but OK. Walking most mornings, doing my back exercises Monday and Wednesday (I need to do a minimum of three days a week). I need to walk around campus on a regular basis as well during the day once classes start. I'm not sure when yoga will start, but probably after next week, when I've had time to adjust to my teaching schedule. It also gives me time to adapt to low carb, a little lost weight, and get my back in a bit better condition.
So, I'm happy with the way it's going so far. "Low and slow" is not only for cooking grass-fed beef!
Monday, January 11, 2010
First, the ugly truth (OK, that's overkill!) about where I am now:
As you can tell, I have far too much of the weight around the middle that is so damaging metabolically. The plan is to change that!
After getting up, I walked for about 20 minutes, did my back exercises, then took these pictures before a breakfast of a protein shake (water, 1 scoop designer whey, 1 scoop of metabolic drive low-carb, heaping tablespoon of all-natural yoghurt (full fat), couple tablespoons of cream, and a couple tablespoons of virgin coconut oil). I'll likely alternate this with eggs.
Lunch out with colleagues while at work--an Italian restaurant--so a salad with salmon. No bread, water to drink. Then dinner fixed by my wife: grass-fed steak (much better fat profile, no hormones or antibiotics), green beans with butter, and a mandarin orange, plus one dove dark chocolate. Before going to bed, a much smaller version of the protein shake without so much fat, partly to take my magnesium and zinc, which tend to give me a bit of heartburn.
So that's the start . . .
Sunday, January 10, 2010
OK, maybe some other thought and planning, too!
But Mark's approach is one that makes a lot of sense to me. You don't have to buy the book (but it's a great way to have it all in one place and I recommend it), Mark outlines much on his blog. Here's his post on Primal eating.
Protein takes priority. If there is ample glycogen (stored glucose) and the body is getting the rest of its energy efficiently from fats, protein will always go first towards repair or building cells or enzymes. In that context, it hardly seems fair to assign it a “burn rate” of 4 calories per gram. It’s like saying the 2×4 studs that support the walls of your house can burn nicely if you run out of firewood. They will, but I prefer to burn other fuel first. At a minimum you need .5 grams of protein per pound of lean mass/per day on average to maintain your “structure”. If you are moderately active you need .7 or .8, and if you are an active athlete you need as much as 1 gram of protein per pound of lean mass. That’s at a minimum, but it’s on a daily average. So a 155 lb moderately active woman who has 25% body fat (and thus) has 116 lb of lean body mass needs 93 grams of protein on average per day (116 x .8). If she gets 60 or 80 some days and 110 on others, she’ll still be in a healthy average range. And even if she exceeds the 110, it’s no problem if she’s eating low carb because the excess protein will convert to glucose, which will reduce her effective carbohydrate needs (see below). At 4 calories per gram, that’s between 320 and 440 calories per day in protein. It’s not that much.Carbs:
If you’ve forgotten everything you ever learned in biology, just remember this and “own” it: Carbohydrate drives insulin drives fat (Cahill 1965, and Taubes 2007). The idea in the PB is to limit your carbs to only those you need to provide glucose for the brain and for some reasonable amount (certainly less than an hour) of occasional anaerobic exercise. And the truth is, you don’t even need glucose to fuel the brain. Ketones from a very-low carb diet work extremely efficiently at that task. Either way, ideally, we would like most of our daily energy to come from dietary or stored fats. Typically, (if you are at an ideal body composition now) I use a rule of thumb that 100-150 grams of carbohydrate per day is plenty to keep you out of ketosis (and ketosis is NOT a bad thing) but away from storing the excess as fat if you are the least bit active. Don’t forget that your body can make up to 200 grams of glycogen from fats and protein every day, too. On the other hand, if you are looking to lose body fat, keeping carbs to under 80 grams per day will help immensely in lowering insulin and taking fat out of storage. On the other other hand, if you are insistent on training hard for long periods of time, you would add more carbs (say, 100 per day extra for every extra hour you train hard). It becomes a matter of doing the math and experimenting with the results.
Ironically, it’s tough to exceed 100 grams of carbs even if you eat tons of colorful vegetables – as long as you eat like our ancestors and consume no grains, no sugars and few starchy vegetables (potatoes, yams, beets, legumes, etc). Even if you eat a ton of vegetables AND a fair amount of fruit, you’ll be hard pressed to exceed 150 grams of carbs on average per day. Our remote ancestors couldn’t average 150 grams of carbs a day if they tried, yet they had plenty of energy and maintained their lean mass. At 4 calories per gram that’s only between 400 and 600 calories per day. Add that in to the protein above and our sample girl is barely at 1,000 calories on the high end. So where does the rest of the fuel come from?
Learn to love them. They are the fuel of choice and should become the balance of your Primal Blueprint diet. Fats have little or no impact on insulin and, as a result, promote the burning of both dietary and stored (adipose) fat as fuel. Think about this: if protein and carbs stay fairly constant (and carbs stay under 150), you can use fat as the major energy variable in your diet. Feeling like you need more fuel (and you’ve already covered your bases with protein and carbs)? Reach for something with fat. Nuts, avocados, coconut, eggs, butter, olive oil, fish, chicken, lamb, beef, the list is a long one. 100 grams of fats per day would only add 900 calories to our girl’s daily average, putting her at between 1620 and 1940 calories a day. Even if she averages somewhere between 1400 and 2200 calories per day over a few weeks, as long as she pays attention to protein and carbs, her body composition will shift to lower body fat and more desirable lean mass. If she decides to do some walking, a few brief intense weight sessions and a sprint day here and there, that process would accelerate greatly. If she gets to a point where she’s content with her body fat, she can even add in a little more fat to provide energy that she previously got from her stored fat.
The main thing I’ve figured out from eating this way for years is that I don’t need nearly as many calories to maintain health, mass, and body fat as I once thought I did – or as the Conventional Wisdom says I do. I eat 600-1000 calories per day less than when I ate a carbohydrate-based diet, yet I maintain slightly lower body fat and slightly higher muscle mass on even less training. Remember: 80% of body composition is determined by diet. The best part is that I don’t ever feel hungry because I base my eating on exactly what my 10,000-year-old genes want me to eat.
Yesterday, we went to the Farmer's Market and got some grass/pasture fed beef, pork, and chicken. I'll tell you how it works out!
And I'll let you know what I'm eating. It'll be my way of tracking what I do.
Today (Sunday) will be the last day of eating whatever comes to mind (i.e., as a carboholic, carbs of all kinds, simple sugars--too much of that for someone who's pre-diabetic).
My challenge to myself is to stick with a Primal way of eating for at least 30 days.
Exercise-wise, I'll get started with Bikram Yoga (not one of Mark's types of Primal exercise, but necessary for incredibly stiff/inflexible me), my back exercises (more later), and some walking. I'll get into some more intense Primal exercise (weights, sprinting) later--but have to succeed with this first!
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
His most recent post, It's a Journey, not a Race, is terrific for me.
While I'm starting this blog with the New Year, it can't be just a New Year's Resolution for me to be successful with this transformation. Since it means changing the way I live, permanently, a simple resolution won't do it. And the attitude of a journey is exactly what I mean by transformation.
A diagnosis of metabolic syndrome means that you suffer from three or more of these conditions: impaired ability to handle blood sugar, high blood pressure, elevated blood fats, low HDL (“good” cholesterol) and a large waist circumference.Those with metabolic syndrom who were overweight had a much higher incidence of heart disease.
This article describes me (and I'm nearly 60, not 50), so it's even more important for me to move in the right direction.
Just more reasons for transformation . . .
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
My sleep habits have never been good and as I've gotten older, have gotten worse.
For me, it's rarely normal insomnia (although occasionally I have trouble getting to sleep), but more often going to sleep, then waking up 2-4 hours later and THEN not being able to get back to sleep (or being up for a couple hours before managing it).
I suppose if I were truly productive during those hours it might be worth it, but it rarely is! I'm much more likely to surf the net.
I've always been a late-night person and, even as a kid, tended to be the last of the cousins to sleep when we were together over holidays. And even when I'm in an early morning routine--and going to bed at a more reasonable hour--I can get back to the late night (early morning, really: one or two AM) with just one or two late nights because of travel, a late concert or party, etc. My brain and body clock shift back to their preferred routine very quickly
So one of the things I have to address is better sleep habits. The route to good sleep usually includes the following:
- get up at the same time every morning, weekends included (so your cycle is always the same)
- no stimulating activity (TV, computer) late at night
- have a usual bedtime regime (ablutions, hot bath, meditation, writing down the things that need to be done tomorrow, etc.)
- keep your bedroom dark and cool
- use your bedroom only for sleep (and lovemaking!), so you associate it with those things only, not watching TV, reading, etc.
- exercise, but not in the evening, so you're normally tired
- cut down on stimulants (caffeine)
- my body's overheated (hot, sweaty)
- I have trouble breathing (I use a C-PAP for sleep apnea -- if you can't breathe through your nose, you can't breathe--and I have allergies that tend to act up regularly)
- my back is sore
- I'm a middle-aged male: I have to pee!
- get up at the same time every day
- cut out late-night computer/tv and find something that is relaxing (set a limit as to how late I can do those things--10 PM?
- build a pre-bedtime regime (I'll have to think about that one)
- as my exercise program gets into gear (Bikram Yoga, back exercises, walking), that should help on the physical front
- as my back is healthier, it should take away one cause of my waking up (backaches)
- I also wonder if carbs (especially eaten late) cause the overheating--it'll be interesting to see if low(er) carb and no eating in the evening after dinner makes a difference
- don't drink fluids after about 7 PM!
- when I find a doctor in my new town, I'll see if my current allergy regime can be better (right now take claritin once per day and use a steroid nasal mist (nasacort) to keep down swelling--all of which would mean not waking up because I can't breathe through my nose
- when I DO wake up in the middle of the night, I need a better way to deal with it. Maybe I should do productive work . . . or maybe find something soothing to do
Sunday, January 3, 2010
I'm not trying to change eating habits yet (I'll worry about that after getting home on Thursday), but the above shows areas for big improvement:
- good, high-protein breakfast (eggs, meat, or a protein drink)
- lunch that's low in carbs
- DON'T drink sugared drinks! (I'm a cola addict when I'm drinking them--lots of high fructose corn syrup--and a concentrated source of sugar)
- learn how to eat healthily when out to eat (and be HAPPY about it!)
I've had two back surgeries (some time ago: 1986 and 1989), laminectomies at the L4/5 level. My back has always been vulnerable and my tendency has been to get tighter and tighter over time (less motion, less flexibility leads to less motion, more restriction).
I've done Bikram twice before, once for about 3 months, and that was the best I've felt--back, shoulder, etc) for a very long time. However, my schedule in recent years (lots of travel, including extended time overseas), made it almost impossible to do this.
Even now (although I won't travel so much), it'll be a challenge to keep up my practice, but I've decided this is the best thing for me to do, outside of back exercises that I should be doing all the time!
But, paying for my first month of Bikram is the first step.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
I'm also a pre-diabetic, having taken metformin for some time now, which has so far kept my A1C counts in the normal/good range (although it's been about a year since I've tested).
I was doing fairly well on diet last spring and summer, but after moving and taking a new job, it's gone downhill, with weight gain (I'll find out how much when I return home and to my scale on the 7th).
I'm definitely a carboholic (NOT good for someone with diabetes on both sides of his family--uncle and cousin on my dad's side, aunt and mother on mom's side). I like it all: bread, pasta, crackers, chips, sweets, coke, etc.
In the past when I've dieted, I've functioned best on a low carb diet, from Atkins to Protein Power. When I say function best, I mean I feel better, mind is clear, no cravings, lots of energy, etc. It takes me two to three weeks of low carbs to get to that point (past the headaches, initial lack of energy and all), but once there it's pretty good.
So why the trouble staying on it?
There's quite a good post on Dr. Michael Eade's site (co-author of Protein Power and related books, all good) about falling off the wagon. Part of the problem is we live in a carb-rich environment, so our brains are constantly being bombarded with the tempting carbs we love. And for people like me, it doesn't take many carbs to set the physical cravings off again.
That, for me, will be the most difficult task: finding ways to stay in the neighborhood (50 grams of carbs a day? 100?) that keeps me metabolically without cravings.
And, of course, the challenge is changing your life so that these aren't temporary changes, but a complete change in what you eat and how you eat--how you live! While I haven't been successful in the past in such permanent changes, that's what I need to do now . . . and to figure out how to do it.
The next thing I'm pondering, is whether for me it's easiest to go "cold turkey" on carbs and do an Atkins-style "induction" (keeping carbs VERY low for a period of time, around 25-30 grams per day, to force the body into learning to burn fat and not carbs) or to move more gradually (low carb breakfast and dinner, allow more at lunch).
Something I'm thinking about . . . more later.